Diksha
The cover translated "The initiation", after a long stinch I was able to enjoy a hindi movie in all its entirety. It was an art genre movie, set up in a classical era of south india, when brahmin and sudr part of society was still segregated by a chasm as big as the grand canyon (if not less). The story revolves around the acharya which is the highest post in a village overseeing religous matters. The turmoil of everyday life and how inspite of being different could not survive the ultimate transformation. Picture features some well known faces, of only whom I could recall Nana Patekar playing the low class sudr.
I will try to brief about the story line itself because its not just the story line that makes a film or story but its shift from one chapter to another, the lines said in between and the whole atmosphere which it recreates; is what makes a feature powerful.
The story starts with a father handing over his only son under the guardianship of acharya of another village for his education and ascension to brahminhood. Nani as the boy is lovingly called is a small boy of around eight who retains his childhood curiosity and candidness at looking at the world, he is contrasted against the older disciples who although learning from long have somehow been deviated from their true calling. His studies start and he is attracted to Nana Patekar (Goga) who works in his home. The life proceeds with Acharya's education and other day to day happenings, meanwhile Goga's aunt expires and he pleads Acharya for her last rights (which in brahmin society was restricted in those times). But he still does it and there is a big hoo haa in the village over the issue his older son also comes disconcerted, to which Acharya replies that what he did was not about right or wrong but to keep Goga's faith alive and not letting him fall apart.
In Acharya's home is also his daughter Yamuna who although a widow lives there with him, which too was a digression in that age. We see Acharya as a righteous man who knows the limits and context of religion and society in the right terms. Goga also respects his Acharya for this righteous nature. Later in the movie Yamuna gets entangled with another village brahmin and gets pregnant while Acharya had been away on his yearly pilgrimage. The truth is known and she had to get it aborted. On returning Goga regretfully announces "I could save your daughter from snakes and fire but not a brahmin".
The movie tactfully deals with many aspects in sync society/ religion/ morals/ women and caste system all intervowen creating a complex miasma to which many fall a victim while others live it through to know the difference and choose. It also pits the society into the context, that very few humans live a self righteous life themselves but are always ready to point a finger on the first sign of human folly. Makes me always remind of a quote
"Public scandal is what constitutes an offence, sins sinned in secret are no sins at all"; after all we all have a past!
The double contrast the movie offers is that although Acharya holds the infinite wisdom of knowing religion from society but his burden of responsibility hinders him to evolve from the rest in the ultimate test, while his son who had earlier questioned him on performing last rights at the sudr's house forsakes his teaching to uphold the truth and so does Goga although an ignorant worker spits his teaching as mere empty words.
Makes us somehow wonder how far does the religion extend in our life, what obligations do we have, and inspite knowing so much do we still fall its victim or brake free. And Although no religion restricts human from right ways, its our society interpretations moulded to suit, which have made these moralistic distinctions of right from wrong. But the ultimate decision lies with you; alone!
Daily humdrumm ---------
Life's progressing, got a promotion; cheers. (Another of those life moments to remember by). After a long time visited Lal Bagh, felt good strolling carefree through this man-made closest facscimile of nature. Yesterday picked up three magazines to while my time; Man, Interiors and Sanctuary. Last one a definate recommendations to any of the nature lovers, superb photography.
I will try to brief about the story line itself because its not just the story line that makes a film or story but its shift from one chapter to another, the lines said in between and the whole atmosphere which it recreates; is what makes a feature powerful.
The story starts with a father handing over his only son under the guardianship of acharya of another village for his education and ascension to brahminhood. Nani as the boy is lovingly called is a small boy of around eight who retains his childhood curiosity and candidness at looking at the world, he is contrasted against the older disciples who although learning from long have somehow been deviated from their true calling. His studies start and he is attracted to Nana Patekar (Goga) who works in his home. The life proceeds with Acharya's education and other day to day happenings, meanwhile Goga's aunt expires and he pleads Acharya for her last rights (which in brahmin society was restricted in those times). But he still does it and there is a big hoo haa in the village over the issue his older son also comes disconcerted, to which Acharya replies that what he did was not about right or wrong but to keep Goga's faith alive and not letting him fall apart.
In Acharya's home is also his daughter Yamuna who although a widow lives there with him, which too was a digression in that age. We see Acharya as a righteous man who knows the limits and context of religion and society in the right terms. Goga also respects his Acharya for this righteous nature. Later in the movie Yamuna gets entangled with another village brahmin and gets pregnant while Acharya had been away on his yearly pilgrimage. The truth is known and she had to get it aborted. On returning Goga regretfully announces "I could save your daughter from snakes and fire but not a brahmin".
The movie tactfully deals with many aspects in sync society/ religion/ morals/ women and caste system all intervowen creating a complex miasma to which many fall a victim while others live it through to know the difference and choose. It also pits the society into the context, that very few humans live a self righteous life themselves but are always ready to point a finger on the first sign of human folly. Makes me always remind of a quote
"Public scandal is what constitutes an offence, sins sinned in secret are no sins at all"; after all we all have a past!
The double contrast the movie offers is that although Acharya holds the infinite wisdom of knowing religion from society but his burden of responsibility hinders him to evolve from the rest in the ultimate test, while his son who had earlier questioned him on performing last rights at the sudr's house forsakes his teaching to uphold the truth and so does Goga although an ignorant worker spits his teaching as mere empty words.
Makes us somehow wonder how far does the religion extend in our life, what obligations do we have, and inspite knowing so much do we still fall its victim or brake free. And Although no religion restricts human from right ways, its our society interpretations moulded to suit, which have made these moralistic distinctions of right from wrong. But the ultimate decision lies with you; alone!
Daily humdrumm ---------
Life's progressing, got a promotion; cheers. (Another of those life moments to remember by). After a long time visited Lal Bagh, felt good strolling carefree through this man-made closest facscimile of nature. Yesterday picked up three magazines to while my time; Man, Interiors and Sanctuary. Last one a definate recommendations to any of the nature lovers, superb photography.
Labels: art movie, diksha, nana patekar